|
Success Stories

Dell Computers Case Study
Background
Dell Corporation decided to implement OfferMaxima's proprietary
ad optimization methodology because Dell's Retail Marketing
VP - Tim Mattox, an MIT engineer - was familiar with multivariate testing.
Dell selected the Employee Purchase Program
(EPP) e-mail campaigns as the initial implementation of OfferMaxima's optimization methodology with the aim of
expanding the project later to other audiences (Home, Corporate
and Small Businesses). EPP mail advertising campaigns are
targeted to 450,000 individuals: 250,000 corporate employees,
150,000 government employees, and 50,000 professors at schools
or universities, all of them users of Dell computers at work.
The aim of Dell's EPP mail campaigns is to sell computers,
software and peripherals to these individuals for their personal
use leveraging the fact that they are already familiar with
the brand. As an enticing benefit, Dell's EPP members enjoy
discounts of up to 12% and special promotions like free shipping,
product bundles, and others.
The response rate of the traditional e-mail marketing is typically
well below the one percent mark. Dell had good lists of potential
customers who already new the brand and its products and had
experience working with Dell computers. Even then the Click
Thru Rate on the control mail was only 3%.
The Results
Below is an extract from Dell's Landing Strip spreadsheet
comparing the response rate and sales of a control and the
optimized mail:
| Campaign |
Message |
Audience Size |
Total Clicks |
Click Thru |
Total Sales |
$Sales/Email |
| EPP Email |
Control |
268,610 |
8,058 |
3.00% |
$90,678 |
$0.34 |
| EPP Email |
Optimized |
142,633 |
22,379 |
15.69% |
$345,095 |
$2.42 |
Summary
• Click Through Rate increase: 5.2 times
• 7.1 times more sales per mail
• Annual sales before optimization: $8,900,000
• Annual sales after optimization: $63,100,000
The Process
This is an example of a Dell EPP mail before the optimization:
A multivariate testing array was selected to analyze 7 factors
with 2 options and 4 factors with 3 options in only 18 test
e-mails. This allowed analysis of 10,368 campaigns with only
18 tests - a small fraction of all possibilities (1:576 in
this case) or a 99.8% compression rate.
The following factors and options
were tested simultaneously:
| Factor |
Option 1 |
Option 2 |
Option 3 |
| Promotion |
Single |
Several |
- |
| Teaser |
Yes |
No |
- |
| Financing |
Yes |
No |
- |
| Price |
High-End |
Low-End |
- |
| S & P* Promotion |
Yes |
No |
- |
| Discount |
5% |
10% |
- |
| Image |
Product |
People |
- |
| Subject Line |
Creative |
Promotion |
Dated |
| Headline |
Creative |
Promotion |
Seasonal |
| Configurations |
Two |
One |
None |
| 2004 EPP |
Both |
Notebook |
Desktop |
* Software & Peripherals
Two test campaigns of 18 test e-mails were sent to 2 different
populations, the first to collect open rate and sales data
and the second to verify the data of the first campaign. The
results are in the table below.
| |
Response
Data |
| |
Open Rate |
Sales |
| Test 1 |
Campaign 1 |
Campaign 2 |
Campaign 3 |
Campaign 4 |
| 1 |
4.8% |
5.7% |
- |
- |
| 2 |
5.2% |
6.1% |
- |
- |
| 3 |
7.2% |
8.4% |
$1,638 |
$1,530 |
| 4 |
10.5% |
11.6% |
$1,913 |
$2,215 |
| 5 |
6.0% |
7.3% |
$1,234 |
$1,755 |
| 6 |
5.0% |
5.8% |
- |
- |
| 7 |
12.7% |
13.8% |
$4,919 |
$4,522 |
| 8 |
7.9% |
8.8% |
$2,890 |
$2,933 |
| 9 |
7.2% |
8.8% |
$1,296 |
$1,104 |
| 10 |
5.5% |
6.4% |
- |
- |
| 11 |
4.9% |
5.8% |
- |
- |
| 12 |
4.2% |
5.0% |
- |
- |
| 13 |
5.5% |
6.4% |
- |
- |
| 14 |
5.7% |
6.1% |
- |
- |
| 15 |
5.2% |
5.8% |
- |
- |
| 16 |
7.4% |
8.3% |
$1,212 |
$896 |
| 17 |
6.3% |
7.0% |
$1,076 |
$1,555 |
| 18 |
9.9% |
10.9% |
$2,448 |
$1,998 |
Below is a table showing the influential factors with the
optimum option and the percentage of influence. Influential
factors were ranked by importance. In this case six factors
were considered to be significant (statistically different
than "noise").
| Factor |
Optimum Option |
Influence |
| Teaser |
Yes |
34% |
| Product Mix |
Desktop |
17% |
| Promotion |
Primary |
16% |
| Headline |
Seasonal |
13% |
| Configurations |
None |
13% |
| Subject Line |
Dated |
7% |
| Financing |
Yes or No |
0% |
| Price |
High-End or Low-End |
0% |
| S & P* Promotion |
Yes or No |
0% |
| Discount |
5% or 10% |
0% |
| Photo |
Product or Lifetstyle |
0% |
* Software & Peripherals
Below are several examples of Dell EPP Email campaigns after
the optimization:


Conclusion
The application of OfferMaxima's optimization
methodology increased Dell's e- mail campaign open rate more
than 5 times and sales more than 7 times in only 4 months.
In addition to these impressive results, Dell was able to
better understand which influential factors did play a role
and at what level for each factor the outcome, as measured
by the Click Through Rate response, was optimized.
Although Dell engineers and marketers considered providing
all the technical specifications important, it did not lure
customers to buy. As can be noted in the ad samples above,
the extensive product specifications of the original ads were
replaced by friendlier, more appealing, and cleaner ads. The
optimized email messages were still being used in January of
2006, 18 months after the original optimization.
Through the application of multivariate testing to their email
campaigns, Dell did gain insight (Marketing Intelligence),
which was used not only in the EPP program but in other marketing
and advertising campaigns as well (Home, Corporate, Small
Business, etc.).
Back
|